Fall 2025 Theme: Crisis

The Center for the Study of Social Difference at Columbia University (CSSD) welcomes proposals for new working groups to begin in Fall 2025. Proposals are due by April 7, 2025.


Crisis

From the recent Los Angeles fires and the gutting of US federal government programs to the wars in Gaza, Lebanon, and Sudan, sweltering heat waves in Europe, and devastating typhoons in the Philippines, crisis appears ubiquitous today even if radically unequally experienced. Scholars have been probing and historicizing this crisis complex and its implications, and investigating how crises experiences are fractured along racial, class, gender, and other lines. Given the significance of crisis in the present, the Center for the Study of Social Difference (CSSD) at Columbia University seeks applications for interdisciplinary, faculty-led research working groups focused on crisis and inequality over the next two years. Various approaches are welcome, but may include crisis in relation to critical university studies, financialization and securitization, housing and migration, climate and catastrophe, ideo-warfare, and public health.

Long held to characterize an aberrant moment or turning point in which norms are questioned, truths revealed, and transformations become possible, ‘crisis’ is now an everyday state of affairs. Working groups applying to the call might critically interrogate contemporary and historical understandings of ‘crisis’ and which events or conditions get defined as crisis and why. This could include considerations of what fails to be registered as a crisis, such as slow and structural violence against marginalized populations. Groups might hone in on some of the political, economic, and social work that mobilizing ‘crisis’ does. This could range from how crisis enables emergency funding in austerity times and the fast-tracking of regulation without public deliberation to how it allows for the accumulation of profits from response and recovery initiatives under ‘disaster capitalism’ and engenders fear and reactionary politics.

Working groups can choose to take up a particular crisis such as Hurricane Sandy and its aftermath or more broadly the cost-of-living, housing, energy, or climate crises, considering their structural roots, systemic qualities, and experiential realities. Groups might hone in on the practices, institutions, and industries that have been put in place to manage and respond to crises and on shortcomings in crisis responses, which tend to be after the fact, short-term, and confounded by entrenched interests and investments. Working groups might branch out from crisis to consider related notions and practices like resilience, mitigation, and adaptation, among others.

In line with its mission, the Center is particularly interested in research that pays attention to how crisis is experienced unevenly by different social groups, how the lived experiences of crisis among impacted communities exceed official accounts, and how already vulnerable communities are made further vulnerable by crisis response and recovery efforts. For instance, working groups might take a class lens onto crisis, attending to how responsibility in crisis has been transferred onto individuals and is most acutely felt by the poor as public services are slashed in the name of efficiency, emergency services privatized, and insurance premiums raised. Resilience discourses might be probed for how they naturalize this transfer in responsibility, justifying and exacerbating abandonment by foregrounding community and self-reliance. Groups might choose to center race alternatively or as well, grappling with the ways in which structural racism and racial capitalism have generated institutional ecosystems that heighten vulnerabilities and drive environmental justice claims.

Citations

Back to top


Annotated bibliography

Building on our thematic focus, we are developing a peer-sourced annotated bibliography of interdisciplinary scholarship on crisis, with a particular eye on crisis and social difference/inequality. The bibliography, found below, aims to document existing conversations on crisis, assist researchers in locating scholarship relevant to their work, and facilitate the expansion of crisis literature. It is a work in progress and is being developed through entries volunteered by scholars on references they consider seminal and think might be useful to others. Anyone can contribute to our annotated bibliography using the form at the bottom of this page.

 

Adding to our annotated bibliography

We welcome contributions to the bibliography, which can be made here. To maintain coherence and unity, all entries will be processed by the Center for the Study of Social Difference team before being posted. Please see the example entry for your reference and ease. We ask that you kindly use Chicago style formatting and let us know if you would like to be added to our list of contributors to the bibliography or remain anonymous.

Example entry

Citation details: Yarimar Bonilla. “The Coloniality of Disaster: Race, Empire, and the Temporal Logics of Emergency in Puerto Rico, USA.” Political Geography 78 (2020) 102181. 
Keywords: Race; imperialism; disaster capitalism; temporality of disaster; repair not recovery; hurricane; Puerto Rico
Author discipline(s): Anthropology

Citation description: Yarimar Bonilla sheds light on the everyday experience of life in the aftermath of Hurricane Maria in Puerto Rico; the conditions of ‘racio-colonial governance’ on the island that preceded the hurricane and exacerbated its effects; and the self-organizing efforts of residents given limited government recovery assistance. Writing about the ‘temporality of disaster’ or how residents experienced time in the storm’s wake, Bonilla highlights how an initial sense of urgency and expectation for governmental action and recovery turned into stalled waiting in the face of neglect. This is contextualized within the broader geography of US racialized neglect that includes Flint, Detroit, and New Orleans and Puerto Rico’s US colony status, where waiting is a form of political subjugation. Hurricane Maria’s impacts are shown to be exacerbated by a preceding debt crisis that was intensified by federally-imposed regulations, some of which date to Puerto Rico’s establishment as a US territory. These regulations restricted the local government’s financial options and prioritized debt repayment, leading to austerity measures that shrunk state services, and weakened infrastructures and disaster response capabilities. In the absence of state assistance, self-reliance and community care initiatives proliferated; these initiatives came to the fore under the debt crisis but have also been strained by its effects. Although cooptable by neoliberal visions of Puerto Rico’s future, which frame the island’s resilience as rendering it good for investment, self-reliance and community care also entail the workings for a new and different future that centers sovereignty and repair. Significantly, Bonilla adds to disaster capitalism theories an emphasis on the enabling role played by racial and colonial structures in post-disaster dispossession, arguing for the term racio-colonial capitalism instead. She underscores how crises like climate change are cut through with the ‘coloniality of power’ rather than being socio-economic levelers as some suggest, questioning what impacts understanding disasters as colonially rooted might have for the shape of post-disaster response. Bonilla challenges the value placed on making communities resilient, suggesting that the demand for communities to be resilient is a demand for them to endure in the face of structural violence.

Back to top